Princeton researchers have dissipated some of the mystery around 'magic angle' graphene's superconductivity by showing an uncanny resemblance between it and the superconductivity of high temperature superconductors. Magic graphene may hold the key to unlocking new mechanisms of superconductivity, including high temperature superconductivity.
Ali Yazdani, Professor of Physics and Director of the Center for Complex Materials at Princeton University, led the research. He and his team have studied many different types of superconductors over the years and have recently turned their attention to magic bilayer graphene. Some have argued that magic bilayer graphene is actually an ordinary superconductor disguised in an extraordinary material, said Yazdani, but when we examined it microscopically it has many of the characteristics of high temperature cuprate superconductors. It is a déjÃ vu moment.
Superconductors made of pure elements like aluminum are what researchers call conventional. The superconductive state where the electrons pair together is explained by what is called the Bardeen-Cooper-Schrieffer (BCS) theory. This has been the standard description of superconductivity that has been around since the late 1950s. But starting in the late 1980s new superconductors were discovered that did not fit the BCS theory. Most notable among these unconventional superconductors are the ceramic copper oxides (called cuprates) that have remained an enigma for the past thirty years.
The original discovery of superconductivity in magic bilayer graphene by Pablo Jarillo-Herrero and his team at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT) showed that the material starts out as an insulator but, with small addition of charge carriers, it becomes superconducting. The emergence of superconductivity from an insulator, rather than a metal, is one of the hallmarks of many unconventional superconductors, including most famously the cuprates.
They suspected that superconductivity could be unconventional, like the cuprates, but they unfortunately did not have any specific experimental measurements of the superconducting state to support this conclusion, said Myungchul Oh, a postdoctoral research associate and one of the lead co-authors of the paper.
To investigate the superconductive properties of magic bilayer graphene, Oh and his colleagues used a scanning tunneling microscope (STM) to view the infinitesimally small and complex world of electrons. This device relies on a novel phenomenon called quantum tunneling, where electrons are funneled between the sharp metallic tip of the microscope and the sample. The microscope uses this tunneling current rather than light to view the world of electrons on the atomic scale.
When the team analyzed the data, they noticed two major characteristics, or signatures, that stood out, tipping them off that the magic bilayer graphene sample was exhibiting unconventional superconductivity. The first signature was that the paired electrons that superconduct have a finite angular momentum, a behavior analogous to that found in the high-temperature cuprates twenty years ago. When pairs form in a conventional superconductor, they do not have a net angular momentum, in a manner analogous to an electron bound to the hydrogen atom in the hydrogen’s s-orbital.
STM operates by tunneling electrons in and out the sample. In a superconductor, where all the electrons are paired, the current between the sample and the STM tip is only possible when the superconductor’s pairs are broken apart. It takes energy to break the pair apart, and the energy dependence of this current depends on the nature of the pairing. In magic graphene we found the energy dependence that is expected for finite momentum pairing, Yazdani said. This finding strongly constrains the microscopic mechanism of pairing in magic graphene.
The Princeton team also discovered how magic bilayer graphene behaves when the superconducting state is quenched by increasing the temperature or applying a magnetic field. In conventional superconductors, the material behavior is the same as that of a normal metal when superconductivity is killed the electrons unpair. However, in unconventional superconductors, the electrons appear to retain some correlation even when not superconducting, a situation that manifests when there is roughly a threshold energy for removing electrons from the sample. Physicists refer to this threshold energy as a pseudogap, a behavior found in the non-superconducting state of many unconventional superconductors. Its origin has been a mystery for more than twenty years.
One possibility is that electrons are still somewhat paired together even though the sample is not superconducting, said Kevin Nuckolls, a graduate student in physics and one of the paper’s lead co-authors. Such a pseudogap state is like a failed superconductor.
The other possibility, noted in the research paper, is that some other form of collective electronic state, which is responsible for the pseudogap, must first form before superconductivity can occur.
Either way, the resemblance of an experimental signature of a peusdogap with the cuprates as well as finite momentum pairing can’t be all a coincidence, Yazdani said. These problems look very much related.
Future research, Oh said, will involve trying to understand what causes electrons to pair in unconventional superconductivity a phenomenon that continues to vex physicists. BCS theory relies on weak interaction among electrons with their pairing made possible because of their mutual interaction with the underlying vibration of the ions. The pairing of electrons in unconventional superconductors, however, is often much stronger than in simple metals, but its cause the glue that bonds them together is currently not known.
I hope our research will help the physics community to better understand the mechanics of unconventional superconductivity, Oh said. We further hope that our research will motivate experimental physicists to work together to uncover the nature of this phenomenon.